Chelsea vs Crystal Palace: Player Ratings as VAR Drama Saves Blues in Opening Draw
Chelsea’s Premier League campaign under Enzo Maresca began with frustration as the Blues were held to a 0-0 draw at Stamford Bridge against Crystal Palace.
Despite plenty of excitement around Maresca’s fresh new-look squad, Chelsea struggled to break down a disciplined Palace side. In fact, the Blues were fortunate when Eberechi Eze’s stunning first-half free-kick was ruled out by VAR, sparing them from an opening defeat.
Here’s a full breakdown of the Chelsea player ratings from the clash…
Chelsea Player Ratings vs Crystal Palace
Robert Sanchez – 7/10
The Chelsea goalkeeper wasn’t overly busy but made four important saves when called upon. His positioning and reactions ensured the Blues didn’t suffer an opening-day defeat.
Reece James – 6/10
Showed attacking intent but struggled defensively against Eze, who caused him problems throughout the first half. Not a vintage display from the Chelsea captain.
Marc Cucurella – 6/10
Looked sharp with his forward runs, linking well at times with new signing Jamie Gittens. However, his final ball was lacking, and he’ll need to sharpen his end product.
Trevoh Chalobah – 6/10
A steady performance. Nothing spectacular, but Chalobah provided some reassurance as cover for the injured Levi Colwill.
Josh Acheampong – 7/10
An impressive outing for the youngster. Confident on the ball and composed in defence, showing real promise despite his lack of top-flight experience.
Moises Caicedo – 7.5/10
Energetic and disciplined, Caicedo was Chelsea’s most reliable midfielder. Broke up play well and pushed the team forward, though he lacked a cutting edge in the final third.
Enzo Fernandez – 5/10
Looked rusty and off the pace, possibly due to recent Club World Cup exertions. Failed to dictate the midfield as Chelsea needed.
Cole Palmer – 4.5/10
Surprisingly quiet. The Blues usually thrive when Palmer is at his best, but he failed to provide his usual spark or threat in attack.
Jamie Gittens – 6/10
A mixed debut. Showed glimpses of his direct style, which could become a huge asset, but lacked chemistry with teammates in key moments.
Pedro Neto – 5/10
A big drop-off compared to his strong Club World Cup form. Nothing came off for him, and he’ll need to step up with competition for attacking spots heating up.
Joao Pedro – 5/10
Struggled with limited service but also failed to make a big impact when he did get the ball. Needs to impose himself more if he wants to keep his place up front.
Substitutes
-
Estevao Willian – 6/10: Lively introduction but lacked end product.
-
Liam Delap – 6/10: Worked hard but had limited opportunities.
-
Malo Gusto – 6/10: Solid in defence after coming on.
-
Andrey Santos – 6/10: Kept things tidy in midfield but no standout contribution.
Final Verdict
Chelsea were saved by VAR but struggled to justify the hype surrounding their new-look squad. While there were positives in Caicedo and Acheampong’s performances, Maresca will know that much more is needed if Chelsea are to challenge this season.